Ea Nam Wind Power Project
GS-3442 ↗ · current registry ID: GS11421
#127of 770 in Renewable energy#2of 25 in Vietnam#48of 426 in Gold Standard (GS)#88of 383 in ACM0002
Audit Analysis
The Ea Nam Wind Power Project is a Gold Standard wind project in Vietnam with a VVB-confirmed investment additionality test and consistent ERR figures (1,056,167 tCO₂e claimed and verified). However, six contradictions across documents—including a baseline method discrepancy (project-specific vs. jurisdictional) and inconsistent leakage justifications—introduce moderate data-reliability concerns. All seven material findings were corrected and closed, and safeguards (FPIC, grievance mechanism, benefit sharing) are documented, but the absence of a buffer pool and the unresolved baseline characterization limit confidence.
Red Flags
- Baseline method is described as 'project-specific' in the verification report (2024) but 'jurisdictional' in the monitoring report (2025) — an unresolved contradiction that affects the credibility of the emission-factor basis (0.823 tCO₂/MWh, 2021 grid EF).
- Leakage deduction is 0% with justification stated as 'not addressed' in the verification report but 'deemed negligible' in the later monitoring report — the inconsistency weakens the leakage treatment.
- No buffer pool percentage is stated in any available document, and reversal events are listed as 'not addressed,' leaving permanence risk unquantified even for a low-risk wind project.
- SDG 7 and SDG 13 co-benefit impacts were found to be approximately 50% lower than estimated in the approved PDD due to unfavorable wind resources and O&M activities, indicating estimation uncertainty in the project's performance modelling.
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 351,918 | 0 | 351,918 | |
| 2023 | 555,454 | 2,860 | 552,594 | |
| 2024 | 599,889 | 0 | 599,889 | |
| 2025 | 242,881 | 0 | 242,881 | |
| Total | 1,750,142 | 2,860 | 1,747,282 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed investment test
No buffer pool; reversal not addressed
0% deduction; justification inconsistent
Project vs. jurisdictional contradiction
FPIC, grievance, benefit sharing documented
CORSIA and CCP status not stated
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →