Skip to main content
GSWindViet NamACM0002

Ea Nam Wind Power Project

GS-3442 ↗ · current registry ID: GS11421

#127of 770 in Renewable energy#2of 25 in Vietnam#48of 426 in Gold Standard (GS)#88of 383 in ACM0002

6.1/ 10
Integrity
6.0
Transparency
6.5
Claim Safety
6.0
Documentation
6.0

Audit Analysis

The Ea Nam Wind Power Project is a Gold Standard wind project in Vietnam with a VVB-confirmed investment additionality test and consistent ERR figures (1,056,167 tCO₂e claimed and verified). However, six contradictions across documents—including a baseline method discrepancy (project-specific vs. jurisdictional) and inconsistent leakage justifications—introduce moderate data-reliability concerns. All seven material findings were corrected and closed, and safeguards (FPIC, grievance mechanism, benefit sharing) are documented, but the absence of a buffer pool and the unresolved baseline characterization limit confidence.

Red Flags

  • Baseline method is described as 'project-specific' in the verification report (2024) but 'jurisdictional' in the monitoring report (2025) — an unresolved contradiction that affects the credibility of the emission-factor basis (0.823 tCO₂/MWh, 2021 grid EF).
  • Leakage deduction is 0% with justification stated as 'not addressed' in the verification report but 'deemed negligible' in the later monitoring report — the inconsistency weakens the leakage treatment.
  • No buffer pool percentage is stated in any available document, and reversal events are listed as 'not addressed,' leaving permanence risk unquantified even for a low-risk wind project.
  • SDG 7 and SDG 13 co-benefit impacts were found to be approximately 50% lower than estimated in the approved PDD due to unfavorable wind resources and O&M activities, indicating estimation uncertainty in the project's performance modelling.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2022
351,9180351,918
2023
555,4542,860552,594
2024
599,8890599,889
2025
242,8810242,881
Total1,750,1422,8601,747,282

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed investment test

Permanence

No buffer pool; reversal not addressed

Leakage

0% deduction; justification inconsistent

Baseline

Project vs. jurisdictional contradiction

Safeguards

FPIC, grievance, benefit sharing documented

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-25ACM0002

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents