Skip to main content
GSBiogas - ElectricityHondurasAMS-III.H

*EECOPALSA biogas capture & utilization

GS-457 ↗ · current registry ID: GS344

#90of 111 in Biogas#404of 426 in Gold Standard (GS)#19of 22 in AMS-III.H

3.8/ 10
Integrity
4.5
Transparency
3.0
Claim Safety
4.0
Documentation
3.0

Audit Analysis

The EECOPALSA biogas project in Honduras has a verified investment-test additionality and a measured baseline, but is undermined by an extensive list of 30+ corrective actions revealing a severely deficient MRV system (no quality management system, no calibration procedures, no reporting procedures). Seven contradictions between documents—including conflicting leakage justifications, inconsistent ERR figures, and a baseline described as both measured and modeled—further erode confidence in the carbon accounting. The absence of a buffer pool, FPIC, and grievance mechanism, combined with unstated CORSIA/CCP status, leaves material gaps in permanence and safeguards.

Red Flags

  • 30+ corrective actions issued by the VVB, including no quality management system, no calibration procedures, no reporting procedures, and missing biogas temperature measurements
  • No buffer pool percentage stated in any available document, leaving permanence risk unaddressed for a biogas project
  • Leakage justification contradicts itself across documents: 'quantified' in the 2011 verification report vs 'deemed negligible' in the 2010 monitoring report, both with a 0% deduction
  • ERR figures conflict: the 2010 monitoring report claims 28,344 tCO2e while the 2011 verification report confirms only 25,011 tCO2e, an 11.4% reduction
  • Baseline described as 'measured' in the monitoring report but 'modeled' in the PDD, creating methodological ambiguity

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2006
7,18507,185
2007
29,492029,492
2008
27,589027,589
2009
1,62801,628
Total65,894065,894

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed investment test

Permanence

No buffer pool stated; no reversal events but no safeguard

Leakage

0% deduction with contradictory justifications across docume

Baseline

Project-specific; measured vs modeled inconsistency; no reas

Safeguards

Safeguards mentioned and benefit sharing described, but no F

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in any document

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-24AMS.I.D version 08; AMS III.H. version 02

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents