*EECOPALSA biogas capture & utilization
GS-457 ↗ · current registry ID: GS344
#90of 111 in Biogas#404of 426 in Gold Standard (GS)#19of 22 in AMS-III.H
Audit Analysis
The EECOPALSA biogas project in Honduras has a verified investment-test additionality and a measured baseline, but is undermined by an extensive list of 30+ corrective actions revealing a severely deficient MRV system (no quality management system, no calibration procedures, no reporting procedures). Seven contradictions between documents—including conflicting leakage justifications, inconsistent ERR figures, and a baseline described as both measured and modeled—further erode confidence in the carbon accounting. The absence of a buffer pool, FPIC, and grievance mechanism, combined with unstated CORSIA/CCP status, leaves material gaps in permanence and safeguards.
Red Flags
- 30+ corrective actions issued by the VVB, including no quality management system, no calibration procedures, no reporting procedures, and missing biogas temperature measurements
- No buffer pool percentage stated in any available document, leaving permanence risk unaddressed for a biogas project
- Leakage justification contradicts itself across documents: 'quantified' in the 2011 verification report vs 'deemed negligible' in the 2010 monitoring report, both with a 0% deduction
- ERR figures conflict: the 2010 monitoring report claims 28,344 tCO2e while the 2011 verification report confirms only 25,011 tCO2e, an 11.4% reduction
- Baseline described as 'measured' in the monitoring report but 'modeled' in the PDD, creating methodological ambiguity
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 7,185 | 0 | 7,185 | |
| 2007 | 29,492 | 0 | 29,492 | |
| 2008 | 27,589 | 0 | 27,589 | |
| 2009 | 1,628 | 0 | 1,628 | |
| Total | 65,894 | 0 | 65,894 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed investment test
No buffer pool stated; no reversal events but no safeguard
0% deduction with contradictory justifications across docume
Project-specific; measured vs modeled inconsistency; no reas
Safeguards mentioned and benefit sharing described, but no F
CORSIA and CCP status not stated in any document
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →