CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Workbench ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index

Rated

Reforestation Sierra Piura

Standard
GS
Registry
GS-1800 ↗ · current registry ID: GS3381 · Registered
Country
Peru
Credit type
A/R
Developer
Cooperativa Norandino
Worked comparison example (English)

CarbonMeld's document-based rating gives Reforestation Sierra Piura (GS-1800) 3.5 out of 10 (Low rating) under CarbonMeld methodology v3, documents read on 30 Oct 2026. The analysis read 9 of the 9 registry documents. It is CarbonMeld's own assessment, not a rating given by the registry or the standard.

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based rating

01020304 Document-based rating 3.5 / 10
Additionality 🔒 Quantification 🔒 Permanence 🔒 Claim safety 🔒
The dimension values are in Premium — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero values.

Document-based rating

3.5/10

Low rating (3.5 to 4.9)

Evidence coverage: medium

How solid the credit is, as far as the registry's public documents show. Additionality and quantification start from a public grade; permanence starts at 5.0, the neutral point, where none applies, and claim safety always does.

Methodology v3 · documents read on 30 Oct 2026

Starting point

  • Additionality: CCQI's score for this type of project (CCQI does not list this methodology under this programme: the grade CCQI gives this type of project under the programme)
  • Quantification: CCQI's score for this type of project (CCQI does not list this methodology under this programme: the grade CCQI gives this type of project under the programme) (CCQI grades version 2 of this methodology)
  • Permanence: CCQI's score for this type of project (CCQI grades permanence by programme: this is its grade of the project's programme)
  • Claim safety: neutral (5.0) — no public grade of this type of project applies

Rules that lowered the number: 1

Each rule, with the fact and the source it rests on, is in the Premium analysis.

Not counted in the number

  • The baseline type: not among the facts read
  • The oldest vintage still on sale, the content of the safeguards and the verifier's quality: not among the facts read

Analysed on 30 Oct 2026

evidence: 9/9 registry documents read

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

How this analysis was made

Standard
Gold Standard (GS) How our current method reads projects of this standard
Methodology
GS4GG AR methodology v.1.1 No methodology-specific rules: the general rules apply. Read the general rules
Our method
CarbonMeld methodology v3 · documents read on 30 Oct 2026 · 9/9 registry documents read

Analysis

Reforestation Sierra Piura (Peru) plants trees on land that is not forest (afforestation / reforestation, agroforestry allowed) and is credited for the CO2 the growing trees remove (Reforestation with Pinus patula, Pinus radiate, Alnus jorullensis, and Polylepis incana) under GS4GG AR methodology v.1.1; registry status Registered (GS), 1,021 credits issued (vintages 2011–2018). The documents name GFA Certification GmbH as validation / verification body. A verification is recorded (registry or documents). The verification report of 2019-05-27 states a negative quantity for 2010-01-01 – 2018-12-31: -161 tCO2e, net emissions for that period as it writes it; the registry issued 1,021 credits for vintages 2011–2018 of that period.

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label · read on 12 Nov 2026

    Covers: this project's credit records as read on the registry

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    No ICVCM information

    No CCP label and no ICVCM decision found for this project's methodology.

  • Removal or reduction

    Carbon removal

    Takes CO₂ out of the atmosphere — the only type that can neutralise residual emissions in an SBTi net-zero claim.

    Source: registry label · read on 12 Nov 2026

    Covers: the project type, not a label on individual credits

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish Article 6 authorizations.

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Credit VintagesExhausted

IssuedRetiredAvailablePlanned (PER)
2011
39390—
2012
1061060—
2013
1461460—
2014
1461460—
2015
1461460—
2016
1461460—
2017
1461460—
2018
1461460—
2019
00065
2020
000671
2021
0003,269
2022
0003,539
2023
0002,703
2024
0004,411
2025
0002,580
2026
000441
2027
0001,059
2028
0004,687
2029
0006,338
2030
0003,686
2031
0002,067
2032
0001,993
2033
0003,688
2034
0004,768
2035
000900
Total1,0211,021046,865

Planned (PER): Gold Standard planned emission reductions, issued ex-ante and not yet verified. They are not counted as issued or available credits.

Retired by

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records.

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at listings@carbonmeld.com.

⚑ Contest this rating

Profile & governance

Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System·Carbon credit ratings explained·Carbon credit due diligence checklist

Are you the project owner?

Full analysis (free for owners)

Owners get free access to the full analysis of their own project: every rule that raised or lowered the number, with the fact and the source it rests on, the negative facts' detail and the documents read. Write to us from your organisation's email address.

hello@carbonmeld.com →

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the rating.

hello@carbonmeld.com →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →

Cite this page

CarbonMeld (2026). Reforestation Sierra Piura (GS-1800): CarbonMeld document-based rating, methodology v3, documents read on 30 Oct 2026. https://carbonmeld.com/projects/reforestation-sierra-piura/.

The citation names the rating by its methodology version and the day the documents were read.

Unlock the full analysis

The dimension values of the rating, every rule that raised or lowered the number with the fact and the source it rests on, the negative facts' detail and quotes, and 9 registry documents (9 read).

€9+ VAT per month · card subscription, renews automatically until you cancel

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and the dimension values in side-by-side comparisons, when every rated project is on the same version of our methodology (public-data comparison, the negative facts included, is free; fair use: 30 projects per day, or 300 with Pro at €49 + VAT per month). Cancel any time from your account page. Crypto: $9 for one month, no automatic renewal.

Enter your email to pay with crypto

Price + VAT · By subscribing or paying you accept the Terms of Use — the card subscription renews every month until you cancel; digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Similar projects

Same methodology or sector, the same registry first.