CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index BuyersCORSIA supplyCheck an offerAPI & MCP Method About the System Editorial Policy Score Your Project
EN
Workbench ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index
← All projects
ArchivedGSremovalTimor-LesteRegistry: RegisteredGeneral Methodologyv2.1

WithOneSeed Community Forest Programme, Timor-Leste

Developer: xpand Foundation

GS-1805 ↗ · current registry ID: GS4210

Worked comparison example (English)
This rating is archived — the project is no longer listed or its registry data has changed. This is the last published analysis (2026-09-10).

Assessment

Historical analysis — archived

01020304 Overall 5.3 / 10
Integrity 🔒 Transparency 🔒 Claim Safety 🔒 Documentation 🔒
Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Archived — historical analysis · 2026-09-10

Scored2026-09-10medium confidenceLatest verified monitoring: 2023-11-30

evidence:18/20registry documents analyzed · 4red flags

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

Analysis

The WithOneSeed Community Forest Programme is a Gold Standard REDD project in Timor-Leste with a verified combined additionality test and a 20% buffer pool, but it carries significant data-quality concerns: a 15,641 tCO2e overestimation was identified in the 2021 audit, the PDD and an appendix disagree on the lifetime ex-ante estimate by roughly 35%, and the leakage treatment (0% deduction, 'deemed negligible') is thin for a community forestry project where displaced slash-and-burn is a realistic risk. The project delivered below its pro-rata ex-ante expectation for the 2021–2023 monitoring window, which is conservative, but the realised over-crediting correction and the low extraction confidence across 18 documents temper confidence in the underlying numbers.

Red Flags

4 red flags detected — Unlock with Premium

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, 4 red flags, score factors, detailed analysis, and 20 registry documents (18 analyzed).

€9+ VAT · 30-day pass · one-time, no auto-renewal

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons for 30 days (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day).

Price + VAT · By paying you accept the Terms of Use — digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    Stated in the project documents

    The documents claim CORSIA eligibility, but no registry label confirms it: check vintage and authorization.

    Source: project documents (not confirmed by the registry)

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    No ICVCM information

    No CCP label and no ICVCM decision found for this project's methodology.

  • Removal or reduction

    Carbon removal

    Takes CO₂ out of the atmosphere — the only type that can neutralise residual emissions in an SBTi net-zero claim.

    Source: registry label

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish Article 6 authorizations.

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-09-27

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2010
5055050
2011
8668660
2012
1,4941,4940
2013
1,9401,9400
2014
3,2523,2520
2015
5,2755,2750
2016
11,52511,5250
2017
5,0195,00217
2018
12,79612,7960
2019
15,98815,9880
2020
16,10616,1060
2022
19,83319,8330
2023
34,33134,3310
Total128,930128,91317

Retired by

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records. (+8)

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceGeneral Methodologyv2.1
Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →