Skip to main content
ISOCarbon RemovalGeneral Methodologyv2.1

Seoni Enhanced Rock Weathering Project

ISO-1JKR5RQG81S0 ↗

#7of 11 in DAC#24of 52 in ISO

4.1/ 10
Integrity
4.5
Transparency
3.5
Claim Safety
4.5
Documentation
3.5

Audit Analysis

The Seoni Enhanced Rock Weathering project (Mati Carbon, Isometric standard) presents a scientifically grounded design with a 20% buffer pool, quantified leakage treatment, and documented safeguards including FPIC and a grievance mechanism. However, the verification body is the standard's own headquarters (Isometric HQ Ltd), raising independence concerns, and no quantitative ERR figures, monitoring data, or independent storage verification are available. The project is in a pre-implementation stage (crediting period begins January 2025), so the absence of monitoring data is expected, but the 1000-year permanence claim and project-specific baseline remain unverified by an independent third party.

Red Flags

  • The verification body is Isometric HQ Ltd, the standard's own headquarters, rather than an independent third-party VVB, undermining the independence of the additionality verification and overall audit trail.
  • No quantitative ERR figures (claimed, verified, or ex-ante lifetime) are available in any document, making it impossible to assess over- or under-crediting risk.
  • Six corrective actions remain open in the PDD, including gaps in documenting farmers' fertilization practices, soil sampling methodology in hard clay pan conditions, and lateral water movement accounting.
  • The 1000-year permanence claim, while reasonable for carbonate mineral formation, has not been independently verified and no storage verification data is available.
  • Storage permanence independent verification not found in available documents

Credit Vintages

Issuance data not yet available — check back soon.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Combined test present but VVB is the standard's own HQ, not independent

Permanence

1000-yr claim reasonable for EW; 20% buffer; no reversals

Leakage

Quantified per PDD but no specific deduction value stated

Baseline

Project-specific baseline; no reassessment date; new project

Safeguards

FPIC, grievance mechanism, and benefit sharing all documented

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status both unstated; dual-channel risk unassessed

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-02General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents