Skip to main content
ICRAvoidance / ReductionTRGeneral Methodologyv2.0

Tat Metal PV Bundle

ICR-386 ↗

#682of 770 in Renewable energy#12of 14 in TR#15of 32 in Intl. Carbon Registry (ICR)

3.0/ 10
Integrity
3.5
Transparency
1.5
Claim Safety
4.0
Documentation
2.5

Audit Analysis

The Tat Metal PV Bundle is a solar photovoltaic project in Turkey registered under the ICR standard, but the available evidentiary base is extremely thin — a single appendix document with medium extraction confidence. While the jurisdictional baseline and negligible-leakage treatment are reasonable for a PV project, the complete absence of additionality verification, VVB identification, ERR figures, and monitoring data makes it impossible to confirm the project's integrity or claim safety.

Red Flags

  • No additionality test type or VVB verification found in any available document — a fundamental requirement for any carbon credit project
  • No ERR figures (claimed or verified) available, making over-crediting risk entirely unassessable
  • Only a single appendix document (2025-07-18) forms the evidentiary base; no verification report, monitoring report, or project design document was extracted
  • No VVB identified, no methodology version stated, and no crediting period defined

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2025
6,97406,974
2026
32,287032,287
2027
32,287032,287
2028
32,287032,287
2029
32,287032,287
2030
32,287032,287
2031
32,287032,287
2032
32,287032,287
2033
32,287032,287
2034
32,287032,287
2035
14,096014,096
Total311,6530311,653

Risk Indicators

Additionality

No additionality test or VVB verification found

Permanence

No buffer pool stated; PV project has lower reversal risk bu

Leakage

Deemed negligible, appropriate for PV

Baseline

Jurisdictional method stated; no reassessment date or VVB

Safeguards

Safeguards mentioned but no FPIC or grievance mechanism deta

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-18General Methodology v2.0

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents