CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Workbench ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index

Re-assessment pending

Pamukova Integrated Solid Waste Management Plant Project

Standard
GS
Registry
GS-56 ↗ · current registry ID: GS1073 · Registered
Country
Turkey
Credit type
Biomass, or Liquid Biofuel - Cogeneration
Developer
HEKSAGON KATI ATIK YONETIMI SANAYI VE TICARET A.S
Worked comparison example (English)

Score from methodology v2.1 (analysis of 5 Sep 2026). Re-assessment under v2.2 pending.

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 4.6 / 10
Integrity 🔒 Transparency 🔒 Claim Safety 🔒 Documentation 🔒
Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Re-assessment pending · v2.1

Analysed on 5 Sep 2026medium confidenceLatest monitoring period ends:

evidence: 11/13 registry documents analyzed · 5 red flags

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

How this analysis was made

Standard
Gold Standard (GS) How our current method reads projects of this standard
Methodology
ACM0022, GS ACM0010 No methodology-specific rules: the general rules apply. Read the general rules
Our method
CarbonMeld methodology v2.1 · analysed on 5 Sep 2026 · 11/13 registry documents analyzed · re-assessment under v2.2 pending

Analysis

The Pamukova waste-to-energy project in Turkey has a VVB-verified combined additionality test and a reputable verification body, but is undermined by a project-specific baseline with no documented reassessment, a 0% leakage deduction justified only as 'negligible,' and an extraordinary volume of 23 corrective actions and 8 material findings that point to fundamental gaps in the project's documentation and scope definition. The verified credit volume (43,864 tCO₂e) represents only about 18% of the pro-rata expectation derived from the PDD's lifetime ex-ante estimate of 514,940 tCO₂e, raising questions about the robustness of the original quantification.

Red Flags

5 red flags detected — Unlock with Premium

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label · read on 2 Nov 2026

    Covers: this project's credit records as read on the registry

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    No ICVCM information

    No CCP label and no ICVCM decision found for this project's methodology.

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: registry label · read on 2 Nov 2026

    Covers: the project type, not a label on individual credits

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish Article 6 authorizations.

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Credit VintagesExhausted

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2012
3,5883,5880
2013
11,08911,0890
2014
13,77213,7720
2015
15,41615,4160
Total43,86543,8650

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2012–2015ACM0010 v1.0since replaced by v9.0

    verification report

    official page · verified on

  2. 2012–2015ACM0022 v1.0since replaced by v3.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  • ACM0010: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on
  • ACM0022: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Retired by

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records.

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at listings@carbonmeld.com.

⚑ Contest this rating

Profile & governance

Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System

Are you the project owner?

Full analysis (free for owners)

Owners get free access to the full analysis of their own project: the reasons behind the score, the red flags and the documents read. Write to us from your organisation's email address.

hello@carbonmeld.com →

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

hello@carbonmeld.com →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →

Unlock the full analysis

On this page: the analysis of 5 Sep 2026, marked “Re-assessment pending”. Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, 5 red flags, score factors, detailed analysis, and 13 registry documents (11 analyzed).

€9+ VAT per month · card subscription, renews automatically until you cancel

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day). Cancel any time from your account page. Crypto: $9 for one month, no automatic renewal.

Enter your email to pay with crypto

Price + VAT · By subscribing or paying you accept the Terms of Use — the card subscription renews every month until you cancel; digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Similar projects

Same methodology or sector, the same registry first.