Bugnavilla Afforestation Through High-Quality Timber Over Degraded Grasslands
#16of 66 in Soil carbon#301of 629 in Verra (VCS)#9of 26 in AR-ACM0003
Audit Analysis
A small-scale (under 1.1 ha) Eucalyptus afforestation project in Uruguay with a solid additionality assessment and 17% buffer pool, but significant gaps in verified monitoring data, an unaddressed leakage justification, and low document extraction confidence that collectively limit confidence in the claimed 403,000-tonne lifetime credit volume. Five inter-document contradictions and 12 non-conformity reports (all closed) indicate a project that required substantial correction during validation.
Red Flags
- Leakage deduction of 0% with justification recorded as 'not addressed' in the final validation report (2025-02-21), creating an over-crediting risk for a project converting degraded grassland to plantation
- No verified ERR figure available (total_err_verified not found in any document), making it impossible to confirm actual carbon delivery against the 402,999-tonne lifetime claim
- Low extraction confidence across the document set, meaning at least one key document was poorly readable and critical data may be missing or misread
- Five contradictions between documents on material fields (FPIC, reversal events, buffer pool, benefit sharing, leakage), indicating internal inconsistency in the project record
Credit Vintages
No issuances recorded on the registry.
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed combined test
17% buffer, no reversals, 100-yr period
0% deduction, justification not addressed
Project-specific, not yet due for reassessment
FPIC, grievance mechanism, benefit sharing confirmed
CORSIA and CCP status not stated
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →