CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index BuyersCORSIA supplyCheck an offerAPI & MCP Method About the System Editorial Policy Score Your Project
EN
Workbench ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index
← All projects
Re-assessment pendingGSWindTurkeyRegistry: RegisteredACM0002

Catalca Wind Power Project

Developer: Sanko Enerji Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş

GS-1650 ↗ · current registry ID: GS367

Worked comparison example (English)

#511of 5075 in Renewable energy#48of 432 in Türkiye#123of 2180 in Gold Standard (GS)#348of 3472 in ACM0002

Score from methodology v2.1 (analysis of 1 Sep 2026). Re-assessment under v2.2 pending.

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 6.5 / 10
Integrity 🔒 Transparency 🔒 Claim Safety 🔒 Documentation 🔒
Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Re-assessment pending · v2.1

Scored2026-09-01medium confidence

evidence:34/36registry documents analyzed · 4red flags

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

Analysis

The Catalca Wind Power Project is a mature 60 MW wind facility in Turkey operating under Gold Standard since approximately 2009, with VVB-confirmed additionality and a reasonable leakage justification for a grid-displacement project. Key concerns include the absence of a stated buffer pool, CORSIA eligibility creating dual-channel risk, a project-specific (rather than jurisdictional) baseline, and the non-conduct of FPIC per the most recent verification. The project has delivered at or below its ex-ante estimates across monitoring periods, which is a conservative signal.

Red Flags

4 red flags detected — Unlock with Premium

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, 4 red flags, score factors, detailed analysis, and 36 registry documents (34 analyzed).

€9+ VAT · 30-day pass · one-time, no auto-renewal

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons for 30 days (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day).

Price + VAT · By paying you accept the Terms of Use — digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    Stated in the project documents

    The documents claim CORSIA eligibility, but no registry label confirms it: check vintage and authorization.

    Source: project documents (not confirmed by the registry)

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    Methodology not approved by ICVCMACM0002

    The Integrity Council assessed this methodology as not meeting the Core Carbon Principles.

    Source: ICVCM assessment

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: registry label

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish Article 6 authorizations.

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-09-27

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2008
56,54356,5430
2009
111,218111,2180
2010
114,350114,3500
2011
126,32791,84334,484
2012
50,4089,67140,737
2013
81,24674,9106,336
2014
108,74267,36441,378
2015
119,4572,389117,068
2016
37,91175837,153
2018
122,0562,441119,615
2019
148,1152,962145,153
2020
159,0203,180155,840
2021
150,7813,240147,541
2022
151,5623,056148,506
2023
175,5821,361174,221
2024
162,9530162,953
2025
49,85315949,694
Total1,926,124545,4451,380,679

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2008–2009ACM0002 v6.0since replaced by v22.0

    verification report

    official page · verified on

  2. 2009–2010ACM0002 v6.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  3. 2010–2011ACM0002 v6.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  4. 2011–2012ACM0002 v6.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  5. 2012–2020ACM0002 v17.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  6. 2013–2016ACM0002 v17.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  7. 2018–2021ACM0002 v17.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  8. 2021–2023ACM0002 v17.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  9. 2023–2025ACM0002 v21.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  10. Period not statedACM0002 v21.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  • ACM0002: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Retired by

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records.

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceACM0002 Grid-connected electricity generation from renewable sources
Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →