Guangxi Longan Biomass Power Project
Developer: Guangxi Deli New energy Technology Co. ltd
#127of 875 in Biomass#730of 3063 in China#412of 1609 in Verra (VCS)#15of 132 in ACM0006
Score from methodology v2.1 (analysis of 2 Sep 2026). Re-assessment under v2.2 pending.
Assessment
Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.
Findings
Risk Indicators
🔒
🔒
🔒
🔒
🔒
🔒
Score Breakdown
Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium
Detailed Analysis
The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium
Evidence
Eligibility & market
What can you claim with this credit?
Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).
Airlines (CORSIA)
Pilot phase only (2021–2023)
Eligible only for the pilot phase: not usable for the current 2024–2026 phase.
Source: registry label
Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)
Methodology not approved by ICVCMACM0006
The Integrity Council assessed this methodology as not meeting the Core Carbon Principles.
Source: ICVCM assessment
Removal or reduction
Emission reduction or avoidance
Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.
Source: project sector
Paris Agreement (Article 6)
No Article 6 authorization
No corresponding adjustment: the host country can also count this reduction towards its own target.
Source: registry label
Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.
Registry labels last checked:2026-10-11
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 93,962 | 34,520 | 59,442 | |
| 2020 | 97,925 | 86,761 | 11,164 | |
| 2021 | 72,546 | 42,546 | 30,000 | |
| Total | 264,433 | 163,827 | 100,606 |
Methodology versions used
The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.
2019–2020ACM0006 v14.0since replaced by v16.0
monitoring report + verification report
official page · verified on
2020–2021ACM0006 v14.0since replaced by v16.0
monitoring report + verification report
official page · verified on
2021–2022ACM0006 v14.0since replaced by v16.0
monitoring report + verification report + issuance document
official page · verified on
- ACM0006: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on
A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.
Retired by
- Brisbane City Council30,000 t
- VistaJet27,574 t
- Embracer Group6,800 t
- Yamato Transport Co., Ltd2,800 t
- Polarquest AB2,000 t
- Scandinavian Logistics AB1,823 t
- General Atlantic Service Company, L.P1,315 t
- Celonis Deutschland GmbH1,250 t
- Eythos Global Limited1,150 t
- EY Global Services Limited1,000 t
Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records. (+3)
Where to buy
Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →
+ Know where to buy this?
Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].
Profile & governance
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Contest this rating
Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.
Contest this rating →Share this rating
