ECOLIFE Conservation Patsari Improved Cookstove project Monarch Butterfly Biosphere Reserve Mexico
GS-2626 ↗ · current registry ID: GS7783
#73of 202 in Industrial#5of 27 in Mexico#189of 426 in Gold Standard (GS)
Audit Analysis
The ECOLIFE improved cookstove project in Mexico's Monarch Butterfly Biosphere Reserve has a VVB-confirmed additionality assessment and conservative usage-rate verification, but is undermined by the absence of a stated buffer pool, a project-specific baseline, and an unusually high volume of corrective actions (30+ CARs) that raise data-quality concerns. The verified emission reductions fall well below the claimed figures for the monitoring period, and several cross-document contradictions—though largely attributable to unit differences or different reporting periods—reduce confidence in the internal consistency of the record.
Red Flags
- No buffer pool percentage is stated in any available document, leaving permanence risk for cookstove breakage or reversion to traditional stoves unmitigated
- 30 or more corrective actions (CARs) were raised by the VVB, including errors in ER spreadsheet equations, missing SDG parameters, and a usage survey conducted with stoves younger than the required 2.5-year threshold
- Verified emission reductions (42,927 tCO2e) are only about 66% of the claimed figure (64,961 tCO2e) for the same monitoring period, indicating a material downward adjustment by the VVB
- Leakage treatment is described as 'quantified' in the verification report but 'not addressed' in the validation report, creating ambiguity about whether a deduction was actually applied
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 1,446 | 1,446 | 0 | |
| 2020 | 9,496 | 9,496 | 0 | |
| 2021 | 20,723 | 20,064 | 659 | |
| 2022 | 31,582 | 31,082 | 500 | |
| 2023 | 50,156 | 50,156 | 0 | |
| 2024 | 14,805 | 14,634 | 171 | |
| Total | 128,208 | 126,878 | 1,330 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed combined test
No buffer pool stated; cookstove reversion risk
Quantified per verification but unaddressed in validation
Project-specific; no reassessment date recorded
FPIC, grievance mechanism, and safeguards documented
CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →