FCC-ICELAND carbon credit projects
Browse 30 published projects using FCC-ICELAND, listed alphabetically. There is no ranking for this methodology yet: it appears here automatically once 5 of its projects are rated. Open a project to view its registry details and the analysis available for that project.
What you're looking at
This is an alphabetical list of published projects using FCC-ICELAND. There are not yet 5 projects with a current score and a registry status eligible for ranking. Some projects may already have an assessment; each dossier shows the analysis available.
CarbonMeld scores assess integrity, transparency, claim safety and documentation using project documents. Higher scores indicate stronger evidence under this framework. How to read CarbonMeld scores.
Project names, codes and registry status come from official registry records. Open a project dossier for its source record.
FCC-ICELAND: Skógarkolefni (Forest Carbon Code)
Methodology issuer: Skógarkolefni (Forest Carbon Code), Land and Forest Iceland · Official methodology page.
Forestry · CO2 removals
Projects plant new forest in Iceland on land that has been without forest for at least 25 years. The code forecasts the carbon the new trees will take up and confirms it with field surveys at set intervals during the project.
Source for the activity description
Version 2.2 · Active at Skógarkolefni (Forest Carbon Code), Land and Forest Iceland · status verified on
Version and status refer to the methodology at its issuer. Individual projects may use different versions; these facts do not establish credit eligibility in other programs.
How CarbonMeld reads projects of this type
Versions of the official text these rules cover: 2.0 (web)
What CarbonMeld reads
- Additionality: the project must show it with a test (FCC 1.6 Additionality, p. 5). CarbonMeld reads the test in the documents.
- Leakage: the methodology sets rules for it (FCC 3.2 Carbon leakage, p. 6). CarbonMeld reads it in the project's documents.
- Buffer pool: the methodology sets rules for it (FCC 2.3, p. 1). CarbonMeld reads it in the project's documents.
- Permanence and reversals: the methodology sets rules for it (FCC 2.3 Risks and permanence, p. 1). CarbonMeld reads it in the project's documents.
Figures set against the methodology's own values
- The buffer share is 20% (as stated in Forest Carbon Code 2.0; p. 2). CarbonMeld shows the share in the documents next to it.buffer share: 20% · source: Forest Carbon Code 2.0, p. 2
Deductions that can apply
- REDD+ and reforestation: if the documents read do not address leakage, CarbonMeld lowers integrity by 1.5 and shows a red flag.
- REDD+ and reforestation: if the documents read do not state the buffer pool share, CarbonMeld shows a red flag. It lowers no score.
Set by the methodology, not assessed in this analysis
- No legal requirement for the activity: the methodology sets rules for it (FCC 1.6 Additionality, p. 5). This analysis does not assess it.
Not applicable to this type — never a gap
- Grid emission factor: the criterion does not apply to this methodology. CarbonMeld never counts it as a gap.
- Fraction of non-renewable biomass (fNRB): the criterion does not apply to this methodology. CarbonMeld never counts it as a gap.
- Usage rate of the devices: the criterion does not apply to this methodology. CarbonMeld never counts it as a gap.
- Durability of the storage: the criterion does not apply to this methodology. CarbonMeld never counts it as a gap.
- Sustainability of the feedstock: the criterion does not apply to this methodology. CarbonMeld never counts it as a gap.
- Tracking of the end use: the criterion does not apply to this methodology. CarbonMeld never counts it as a gap.
- Social safeguards and consent of communities (FPIC): the criterion does not apply to this methodology. CarbonMeld never counts it as a gap.
The general rules apply as well. Read the general rules.
- Analysis: Scored
- Analysis: Re-assessment pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Scored
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Re-assessment pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Re-assessment pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Scored
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Re-assessment pending
- Analysis: Scored
- Analysis: Scored
- Analysis: Scored
- Analysis: Scored
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Re-assessment pending
- Analysis: Scored
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Scored
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Scored
- Analysis: Re-assessment pending
- Analysis: Re-assessment pending
Listed alphabetically, not ranked. A methodology leaderboard is computed automatically once 5 of its projects have a current CarbonMeld score and a rankable registry status (projects still in the pipeline or under validation are not ranked). Read the methodology.
