Top AMS-I.F projects
72 rated projects in this methodology · average score 4.9/10 · ranked by CarbonMeld's document-based assessment scores across all four dimensions: integrity, transparency, claim safety and documentation. Showing the top 50 — filter the full table for the rest.
What you're looking at
This page ranks projects using AMS-I.F by their CarbonMeld document-based assessment scores. The rank compares project assessments; it is not a rating of the methodology itself.
CarbonMeld scores assess integrity, transparency, claim safety and documentation using project documents. Higher scores indicate stronger evidence under this framework. How to read CarbonMeld scores.
Project names, codes and registry status come from official registry records. Open a project dossier for its source record. Registry / standard: CDM / UNFCCC · Gold Standard · Verra / VCS .
AMS-I.F: Renewable electricity generation for captive use and mini-grid
Methodology issuer: CDM / UNFCCC · Official methodology page.
Electricity · Emission reductions
Projects generate renewable electricity for an identified user or a local mini-grid. The method measures emissions avoided by replacing more emission-intensive power supplies.
Source for the activity description
Version 5.0 · Active at CDM / UNFCCC · status verified on
Version and status refer to the methodology at its issuer. Individual projects may use different versions; these facts do not establish credit eligibility in other programs.
- 46.9▲+0.2
- 56.8▲+0.7
- 66.8▼-0.2
- 76.7
- 86.7
- 96.6▲+0.4
- 106.6▼-0.1
- 116.5▲+0.1
- 126.2
- 136.1▲+0.9
- 146▲+4.5
- 156▼-1.3
- 165.9▼-0.4
- 175.9▲+0.7
- 185.8▲+0.3
- 195.7▼-1.5
- 205.6▲+0.2
- 215.6▼-1.7
- 225.5
- 235.5
- 245.5
- 255.5▲+4.8
- 265.5▼-2.1
- 275.4▼-0.4
- 285.3
- 295.3▼-1.0
- 305.3▼-0.4
- 315.3▼-1.7
- 325.3▼-1.9
- 335.2
- 345.2
- 355.2▼-1.4
- 365.1▼-0.1
- 375.1▲+3.6
- 385▼-0.8
- 395▼-1.8
- 405▼-0.8
- 414.9▲+0.1
- 424.9▲+0.1
- 434.8▼-0.1
- 444.8
- 454.8▼-0.2
- 464.7▲+3.7
- 474.7▼-0.7
- 484.6▼-0.9
- 494.5▼-0.2
- 504.5▼-1.8
Rank is by document-based assessment score only. The registry status shown next to each project is a separate fact: inclusion in this ranking is not a statement of current validity or credit eligibility — projects suspended, withdrawn or terminated by their registry can still appear, with their status labelled. Read the methodology.